Asch Experiment
What is it?
Asch is an experiment that shows that people are more likely to conform to the majority opinion even if they know that it is wrong.
The Asch Experiment, conducted by psychologist Solomon Asch in the 1950s, was a series of studies designed to investigate the influence of social pressure on an individual's decision-making process. The main goal of the experiment was to understand the extent to which people conform to the opinions of a group, even when those opinions are clearly incorrect.
In layman's terms, the Asch Experiment aimed to explore whether people would go along with the majority's wrong answer just to fit in or avoid conflict.
Here's a simple example of how the experiment was carried out:
- A group of participants was brought into a room, with only one of them being the actual subject of the experiment. The others were "confederates" or actors instructed by the experimenter.
- The group was shown two cards: one with a single line (the "target line") and another with three lines of varying lengths (labeled A, B, and C).
- The task was simple: the participants had to decide which of the three lines (A, B, or C) matched the length of the target line.
- The catch was that the confederates were instructed to give the same wrong answer unanimously, while the actual subject gave their answer after hearing everyone else's.
The results of the Asch Experiment were striking. Even though the correct answer was obvious, about 75% of the subjects conformed to the group's incorrect answer at least once during the trials. On average, subjects conformed to the incorrect group answer about 33% of the time. This demonstrated the powerful influence of social pressure on decision-making, even when it leads to making incorrect choices.
In everyday life, the Asch Experiment can be seen in situations where people might agree with a group opinion they know is wrong just to fit in or avoid conflict. For instance, imagine being in a group of friends who all insist that a particular movie is great, even though you didn't enjoy it. Instead of voicing your disagreement, you might go along with their opinion to avoid standing out or causing tension within the group.
The Asch Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Solomon Asch in the 1950s, is a classic study on the power of social conformity and normative social influence. Asch sought to understand the degree to which individuals would conform to a group's incorrect judgment, even when the correct answer was seemingly evident (Asch, 1956). These experiments have significantly impacted the field of social psychology, shedding light on the profound influence that social pressure can have on individual decision-making and behavior.
The Asch Experiment can be related to various principles and scientific topics, including:
Normative social influence: This concept refers to the pressure that individuals feel to conform to the expectations of others in order to gain social approval and avoid disapproval. The Asch Experiment provided empirical evidence of how normative social influence can lead people to publicly agree with an incorrect group consensus (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
Informational social influence: This principle involves conforming to the opinions of others because they are perceived as having more knowledge or expertise. While the Asch Experiment primarily focused on normative social influence, it also illustrates how individuals may mistakenly rely on others' opinions when they are uncertain or lack information (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955).
Groupthink: Groupthink is a phenomenon where the desire for group consensus and harmony leads to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making. The Asch Experiment demonstrates how individuals might suppress their own opinions to avoid disturbing the group's consensus, which can contribute to the development of groupthink (Janis, 1972).
Obedience to authority: Although the Asch Experiment focused on conformity to peer pressure, it laid the groundwork for later studies on obedience to authority, such as Stanley Milgram experiments. These studies demonstrated that people are often willing to obey authority figures even when it goes against their moral beliefs (Milgram, 1963).
References
- Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
- Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
- Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
- Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.
- Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525